Advanced Search



ISSN  2096-3955

CN  10-1502/P

Citation: LiSheng Xu, Xu Zhang, ChunLai Li, 2018: Which velocity model is more suitable for the 2017 MS7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake?, Earth and Planetary Physics, 2, 163-169. doi: 10.26464/epp2018016

2018, 2(2): 163-169. doi: 10.26464/epp2018016


Which velocity model is more suitable for the 2017 MS7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake?

Institute of Geophysics, Chinese Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100081, China

Corresponding author: LiSheng Xu,

Received Date: 2018-01-12
Web Publishing Date: 2018-03-01

On Aug. 8, 2017, an MS7.0 earthquake struck Jiuzhaigou, a county of Sichuan province, China. A number of investigations and studies have been conducted, some of which involved local velocity models. However, the suitability of these models has not been properly addressed. Here we collect 11 already-existing models, including those used in studies of the 2017 MS7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake, choose 10 local stations surrounding the earthquake, and employ the same technique (TRIT) to relocate the hypocenter. And furthermore, we choose a more suitable model from the 11 already-existed models by analyzing the relocation process and the relocated results for reasonability. Finally, our conclusion is that the model Fang2018 is more suitable and the hypocenter parameters, 103.801°E, 33.192°N and 15.8 km for longitude, latitude and depth, respectively, and 2017-08-08 13:19:46.66 for its origin time, based on this model should be recommended for the 2017 MS7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake.

Key words: the 2017 MS7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake, the more suitable velocity model, the relocation of the mainshock

Bassin, C., Laske, G., and Masters, G. (2000). The current limits of resolution for surface wave tomography in North America. EOS Trans. AGU, 81(48), F897.

Data Management Centre of China National Seismic Network. (2007). Waveform data of China national seismic network. Beijing: Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration. (in Chinese)222

Dziewonski, A. M., and Anderson, D. L. (1981). Preliminary reference earth model. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 25(4), 297-356. doi: 10.1016/0031-9201(81)90046-7

Fang, L. H., Wu, J. P., Su, J. R., Wang, M. M., Jiang, C., Fan, L. P., Wang, W. L., Wang, C. Z., and Tan, X. L. (2018). Relocation of mainshock and aftershock sequences of MS7.0 Sichuan Jiuzhaigou earthquake. Chin. Sci. Bull., 63, 1-14.

Han, L. B., Cheng, J., An, Y. R., Fang, L. H., Jiang, C. S., Chen, B., Wu, Z. L., Liu, J., Xu, X. W., … Wang, Y. S. (2018). Preliminary report on the 8 august 2017 MS 7.0 Jiuzhaigou, Sichuan, China, Earthquake. Seismol. Res. Lett., 89(2A), 557-569. doi: 10.1785/0220170158. doi: 10.1785/0220170158

Ji, L. Y., Liu, C. J., Xu, J., Liu, L., Long, F., and Zhang, Z. W. (2017). InSAR observation and inversion of the seismogenic fault for the 2017 Jiuzhaigou MS7.0 earthquake in China. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 60(10), 4069-4082. doi: 10.6038/cjg20171032

Kennett, B. L. N., and Engdahl, E. R. (1991). Traveltimes for global earthquake location and phase identification. Geophys. J. Int., 105(2), 429-465. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1991.tb06724.x

Kennett, B. L. N., Engdahl, E. R., and Buland, R. (1995). Constraints on seismic velocities in the Earth from traveltimes. Geophys. J. Int., 122(1), 108-124. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1995.tb03540.x

Laske, G., Masters, G., Ma, Z. T., and Pasyanos, M. (2013). Update on CRUST1.0 – A 1-degree global model of earth’s crust. In: EGU General Assembly (Vol 15). Vienna: EGU.222

Wang, C. Y., Han, W. B., Wu, J. P., Lou, H., and Chan W. W. (2007). Crustal structure beneath the eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau and its tectonic implications. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 112(B7), B07307. doi: 10.1029/2005JB003873

Wessel, P., and Smith, W. H. F. (1998). New, improved version of generic mapping tools released. EOS Trans. AGU, 79(47), 579. doi: 10.1029/98EO00426. doi: 10.1029/98EO00426

Xie, Z. J., Zheng, Y., Yao, H. J., Fang, L. H., Zhang, Y., Liu, C. L., Wang, M. M., Shan, B., Zhang, H. P., … Song, M. Q. (2018). Preliminary analysis on the source properties and seismogenic structure of the 2017 MS7.0 Jiuzhaigou Earthquake. Sci. China Earth Sci., 61(3), 339-352. doi: 10.1007/s11430-017-9161-y

Xu, L. S., Du, H. L., Yan, C., and Li, C. L. (2013a). A method for determination of earthquake hypocentroid: Time-reversal imaging technique I – Principle and numerical tests. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 56(4), 1190-1206. doi: 10.6038/cjg20130414

Xu, L. S., Yan, C., Zhang, X., and Li, C. L. (2013b). A method for determination of earthquake hypocentroid: Time-reversal imaging technique–An examination based on people-made earthquakes. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 56(12), 4009-4027. doi: 10.6038/cjg20131207

Xu, X. W., Chen, G. H., Wang, Q. X., Chen, L. C., Ren, Z. K., Xu, C., Wei, Z. Y., Lu, R. Q., Tan, X. B., …. Shi, F. (2017). Discussion on seismogenic structure of Jiuzhaigou earthquake and its implication for current strain state in the southeastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 60(10), 4018-4026. doi: 10.6038/cjg20171028

Yang, Y. H., Fan, J., Hua, Q., Gao, J., Wang, C. L., Zhou, L., and Zhao, T. (2017). Inversion for the focal mechanisms of the 2017 Jiuzhaigou M7.0 earthquake sequence using near-field full waveforms. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 60(10), 4098-4104. doi: 10.6038/cjg20171034

Yi, G. X., Long, F., Liang, M. J., Zhang, H. P., Zhao, M., Ye, Y. Q., Zhang, Z. W., Qi, Y. P., Wang, S. W., … Su, J. R. (2017). Focal mechanism solutions and seismogenic structure of the 8 August 2017 M7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake and its aftershock, northern Sichuan. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 60(10), 4083-4097. doi: 10.6038/cjg20171033

Zhang, X., Feng, W. P., Xu, L. S., and Li, C. L. (2017). The source-process inversion and the intensity estimation of the 2017 MS7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 60(10), 4105-4116. doi: 10.6038/cjg20171035

Zhao, Z., and Zhang, R. S. (1987). Primary study of crustal and upper mantle velocity structure of Sichuan province. Acta Seismol. Sin. (in Chinese), 9(2), 154-166.

Zheng, X. F., Yao, Z. X., Liang, J. H., and Zheng, J. (2010). The role played and opportunities provided by IGP DMC of China national seismic network in Wenchuan earthquake disaster relief and researches. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 100(5B), 2866-2872. doi: 10.1785/0120090257

Zheng, X. J., Zhang, Y., and Wang, R. J. (2017). Estimating the rupture process of the 8 august 2017 Jiuzhaigou earthquake by inverting strong-motion data with IDS method. Chinese J. Geophys. (in Chinese), 60(11), 4421-4430. doi: 10.6038/cjg20171128


Feng Long, GuiXi Yi, SiWei Wang, YuPing Qi, Min Zhao, 2019: Geometry and tectonic deformation of the seismogenic structure for the 8 August 2017 MS 7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake sequence, northern Sichuan, China, Earth and Planetary Physics, 3, 253-267. doi: 10.26464/epp2019027


Xu Zhang, Zhen Fu, LiSheng Xu, ChunLai Li, Hong Fu, 2019: The 2018 MS 5.9 Mojiang Earthquake: Source model and intensity based on near-field seismic recordings, Earth and Planetary Physics, 3, 268-281. doi: 10.26464/epp2019028


YuLan Li, BaoShan Wang, RiZheng He, HongWei Zheng, JiangYong Yan, Yao Li, 2018: Fine relocation, mechanism, and tectonic indications of middle-small earthquakes in the Central Tibetan Plateau, Earth and Planetary Physics, 2, 406-419. doi: 10.26464/epp2018038


Feng Long, ZhiWei Zhang, YuPing Qi, MingJian Liang, Xiang Ruan, WeiWei Wu, GuoMao Jiang, LongQuan Zhou, 2020: Three dimensional velocity structure and accurate earthquake location in Changning–Gongxian area of southeast Sichuan, Earth and Planetary Physics, 4, 163-177. doi: 10.26464/epp2020022


XueMei Zhang, GuangBao Du, Jie Liu, ZhiGao Yang, LiYe Zou, XiYan Wu, 2018: An M6.9 earthquake at Mainling, Tibet on Nov.18, 2017, Earth and Planetary Physics, 2, 84-85. doi: 10.26464/epp2018009


Mei Li, Li Yao, YaLi Wang, Michel Parrot, Masashi Hayakawa, Jun Lu, HanDong Tan, Tao Xie, 2019: Anomalous phenomena in DC–ULF geomagnetic daily variation registered three days before the 12 May 2008 Wenchuan MS 8.0 earthquake, Earth and Planetary Physics, 3, 330-341. doi: 10.26464/epp2019034


WeiMin Wang, JianKun He, JinLai Hao, ZhenXing Yao, 2018: Preliminary result for the rupture process of Nov.13, 2017, Mw7.3 earthquake at Iran-Iraq border, Earth and Planetary Physics, 2, 82-83. doi: 10.26464/epp2018008


Fidèle Koumetio, Donatien Njomo, Constant Tatchum Noutchogwe, Eric Ndoh Ndikum, Sévérin Nguiya, Alain-Pierre Kamga Tokam, 2019: Choice of suitable regional and residual gravity maps, the case of the South-West Cameroon zone, Earth and Planetary Physics, 3, 26-32. doi: 10.26464/epp2019004


TianYu Zheng, YongHong Duan, WeiWei Xu, YinShuang Ai, 2017: A seismic model for crustal structure in North China Craton, Earth and Planetary Physics, 1, 26-34. doi: 10.26464/epp2017004


Qing-Yu Wang, HuaJian Yao, 2020: Monitoring of velocity changes based on seismic ambient noise: A brief review and perspective, Earth and Planetary Physics, 4, 532-542. doi: 10.26464/epp2020048


TianJun Zhou, Bin Wang, YongQiang Yu, YiMin Liu, WeiPeng Zheng, LiJuan Li, Bo Wu, PengFei Lin, Zhun Guo, WenMin Man, Qing Bao, AnMin Duan, HaiLong Liu, XiaoLong Chen, Bian He, JianDong Li, LiWei Zou, XiaoCong Wang, LiXia Zhang, Yong Sun, WenXia Zhang, 2018: The FGOALS climate system model as a modeling tool for supporting climate sciences: An overview, Earth and Planetary Physics, 2, 276-291. doi: 10.26464/epp2018026


LiBo Liu, WeiXing Wan, 2018: Chinese ionospheric investigations in 2016–2017, Earth and Planetary Physics, , 89-111. doi: 10.26464/epp2018011


RiSheng Chu, LuPei Zhu, ZhiFeng Ding, 2019: Upper-mantle velocity structures beneath the Tibetan Plateau and surrounding areas inferred from triplicated P waveforms, Earth and Planetary Physics, 3, 444-458. doi: 10.26464/epp2019045


Zhi Wei, Li Zhao, 2019: Lg-Q model and its implication on high-frequency ground motion for earthquakes in the Sichuan and Yunnan region, Earth and Planetary Physics, 3, 526-536. doi: 10.26464/epp2019054


Jingnan Guo, Robert F. Wimmer-Schweingruber, Mateja Dumbović, Bernd Heber, YuMing Wang, 2020: A new model describing Forbush Decreases at Mars: combining the heliospheric modulation and the atmospheric influence, Earth and Planetary Physics, 4, 62-72. doi: 10.26464/epp2020007


JingZhi Wang, Qi Zhu, XuDong Gu, Song Fu, JianGuang Guo, XiaoXin Zhang, Juan Yi, YingJie Guo, BinBin Ni, Zheng Xiang, 2020: An empirical model of the global distribution of plasmaspheric hiss based on Van Allen Probes EMFISIS measurements, Earth and Planetary Physics, 4, 246-265. doi: 10.26464/epp2020034


XinZhou Li, ZhaoJin Rong, JiaWei Gao, Yong Wei, Zhen Shi, Tao Yu, WeiXing Wan, 2020: A local Martian crustal field model: Targeting the candidate landing site of the 2020 Chinese Mars Rover, Earth and Planetary Physics, 4, 420-428. doi: 10.26464/epp2020045


XinYan Zhang, ZhiMing Bai, Tao Xu, Rui Gao, QiuSheng Li, Jue Hou, José Badal, 2018: Joint tomographic inversion of first-arrival and reflection traveltimes for recovering 2-D seismic velocity structure with an irregular free surface, Earth and Planetary Physics, 2, 220-230. doi: 10.26464/epp2018021


WenAi Hou, Chun-Feng Li, XiaoLi Wan, MingHui Zhao, XueLin Qiu, 2019: Crustal S-wave velocity structure across the northeastern South China Sea continental margin: implications for lithology and mantle exhumation, Earth and Planetary Physics, 3, 314-329. doi: 10.26464/epp2019033


Paul Gautier Kamto, Cyrille Mezoue Adiang, Severin Nguiya, Joseph Kamguia, Loudi Yap, 2020: Refinement of Bouguer anomalies derived from the EGM2008 model, impact on gravimetric signatures in mountainous region: Case of Cameroon Volcanic Line, Central Africa, Earth and Planetary Physics, 4, 639-650. doi: 10.26464/epp2020065

Article Metrics
  • PDF Downloads()
  • Abstract views()
  • HTML views()
  • Cited by(0)

Figures And Tables

Which velocity model is more suitable for the 2017 MS7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake?

LiSheng Xu, Xu Zhang, ChunLai Li